RISK ACCELERATINGThis job’s risk score has been climbing for 2 months straight. The situation is getting worse, not better.
US33-9099
The Impact of AI on Protective Service Workers, All Others
TL;DR: The Verdict
No. Protective Service Workers, All Others face a elevated risk risk of AI replacement over the next 5 years due to 25% exposure to generative language models and automated agents.
United States·Updated 2024-05·↓ Falling -4.5 pts
Risk Score
47.3
Elevated
●0.0 MoM
Compared to Others
Top 41%
#451 of 1104 tracked
More at risk than 59% of jobs in US
Protective Service Workers, All Other is holding steady in United States for now, but some indicators bear watching. Not alarming, but not entirely comfortable either.
Based on BLS employment data, wage trends, hiring volume, and O*NET AI automation research.
Hiring
+37.9%
Wages
-12.3%
Employment
+0.7%
AI Replacement Risk
25%
Risk Over the Last Year↑ Getting worse 2 months in a row
2024-052024-05
What This Means
There are some warning signs for Protective Service Workers, All Other in United States, but it’s not all bad. One major indicator is slipping while the rest hold steady. Check back next month.
Data sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS OES, JOLTS) · FRED · O*NET Database 29.0 (automation exposure) · Real-time vacancy data · Multi-factor composite risk model. Period: 2024-05.Full methodology →
What Should I Do?
Keep an eye on the trends. Your job isn't in immediate danger, but some indicators deserve attention. Set up a free alert and we'll notify you if things change.
Official government data has a 2-month lag. Help us track the real-time market: What are you seeing in your company right now?
Community Insights (UGC)
Are you working in this field? Share your on-the-ground experience with AI and automation to help others understand the true impact.
Recent Community Insights
Anonymous AccountantThreat (Risk)
"AI (specifically LLMs and automated bookkeeping plugins) is doing 80% of our manual data entry now. Entry-level jobs are definitely shrinking. However, complex tax strategy relies on human judgment. If you just do entry, you are at risk. If you advise, you are safe."
Risk scores are quantitative signals based on government statistical releases. They reflect structural labour market trends, not individual job security. Not professional career advice.