Skip to content
IsJobSafe
TerminalRankingsUSProtective Service Workers, All Other
RISK ACCELERATINGThis job’s risk score has been climbing for 2 months straight. The situation is getting worse, not better.
US33-9099

Protective Service Workers, All Other

United States·Updated 2024-05· Falling -4.5 pts

Risk Score
47.3
Elevated
0.0 MoM
Compared to Others
Top 41%
#451 of 1104 tracked
More at risk than 59% of jobs in US
Protective Service Workers, All Other is holding steady in United States for now, but some indicators bear watching. Not alarming, but not entirely comfortable either.
Based on BLS employment data, wage trends, hiring volume, and O*NET AI automation research.
Hiring
+37.9%
Wages
-12.3%
Employment
+0.7%
AI Replacement Risk
25%
Risk Over the Last Year↑ Getting worse 2 months in a row
2024-052024-05
What This Means

There are some warning signs for Protective Service Workers, All Other in United States, but it’s not all bad. One major indicator is slipping while the rest hold steady. Check back next month.

Data sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS OES, JOLTS) · FRED · O*NET Database 29.0 (automation exposure) · Real-time vacancy data · Multi-factor composite risk model. Period: 2024-05.Full methodology →
What Should I Do?

Keep an eye on the trends. Your job isn't in immediate danger, but some indicators deserve attention. Set up a free alert and we'll notify you if things change.

Frequently Asked Questions
Share This Report
Are you in this field?

Official government data has a 2-month lag. Help us track the real-time market: What are you seeing in your company right now?

Same Occupation — Global
AU59.0Elevated
US47.3Elevated← you
JP41.5Low
Same occupation, different labour markets. Cross-country alignment may vary by classification system.
Risk Alert

Get notified when this occupation's risk score crosses a threshold. Free. No account required.

Alert when score exceeds
60 — High (strong headwinds)
Risk scores are quantitative signals based on government statistical releases. They reflect structural labour market trends, not individual job security. Not professional career advice.